Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The wear resistance of quenched-and-partitioned steel (Q&P) compared to martensite steel (Q&T) remains unclear. In this research, the wear resistance of Q&P steel and Q&T steel was researched by the means of the abrasive wear (AW) and impact abrasive wear (IAW) tests. The results show that abrasive ploughing was the main reason causing the material loss of Q&P and Q&T steel, while Q&T steel was subjected to severe fatigue spalling in the impact abrasive wear tests. Under the abrasive wear test, Q&T steel has better wear resistance due to its higher initial hardness. Under the impact abrasive wear test, Q&P steel has better wear resistance. This is because the formation of the deformed layer, which consists of finer grains and newly formed martensite in the worn subsurface, increased the hardness of the Q&P steel, causing the hardness of the worn subsurface in Q&P steel to be higher than that of Q&T steel. Furthermore, Q&P steel has better resistance to cracks nucleation and propagation compared to Q&T steel. As a result, less material loss was caused by fatigue spalling in Q&P steel under the impact abrasive wear tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: