Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, Li‐containing porous carbon materials were prepared from terephthalic acid and lithium hydroxide, and then loaded with different contents of copper oxide. After these materials were fully characterized with X‐ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, Raman spectrum, nitrogen adsorption and desorption, and CO 2 ‐TPD, their CO 2 capture performance was measured. Results showed that the CO 2 capture capacity of CuO(0.75)/LiC at 0 °C under 1 bar was as high as 142.8 mg‐CO 2 g −1 . However, excess CuO significantly reduced CO 2 capture performance of the material. For example, the maximum adsorption capacity of CuO(2)/LiC was only 119.7 mg‐CO 2 g −1 . Meanwhile, with CO 2 /N 2 mixed gas, these materials had significantly and selectively higher CO 2 adsorption capacity over N 2 . Additionally, all of these lithium‐containing carbon‐based porous materials with supported copper oxide, including CuO(0.75)/LiC, could effectively capture CO 2 with high selectivity and reproducibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: