Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mongolian semi-presidential political system which has long suffered from institutional dilemmas and instabilities is very similar to the former political system of Türkiye, which was so-called parliamentary system, but worked just like a semi-presidential system. This paper will explore the newly adopted Turkish presidential system as a search to find out whether or not it would be an applicable model for the cases like Mongolia which have long suferred from political instability. In this regard, I will first draw the situation of Türkiye under the former parliamentary system and show the vulnerabilty of the political system until 2017 when presidential system was adopted. Then, I willl indicate basic characteristics of newly adopted presidential system of Türkiye and how it deals with gridlock. I will argue that Turkish presidential system is a unique political system which brought about stability and efficiency, and thus may be a sample model for the cases like Mongolia having inefficient and instable political environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yılmaz Bingöl (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: