We study monotone equilibrium design by a planner who chooses an interval of reactions that receivers take before senders and receivers move in matching markets with signaling. In our nonlinear settings, surplus efficiency frontier is convex with decreasing-returns-to-scale information technology. The optimal reaction interval crucially depends on the ripple effect of its lower bound and the trade-off between matching inefficiency and signaling cost savings in the top pooling region generated by its upper bound. Our analysis generates cohesive market design results that integrate the literature on minimum wage, firm size distribution, and relative risk aversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: