Chemical equilibrium represents the highest efficiency achievable by a thermochemical cycle under specific operational conditions. This study delves into two-step thermochemical water splitting cycles, which dissociate water into hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2) via sequential thermal reduction and re-oxidation processes. Building on the thermal reduction analysis presented in Part 1, this paper zeroes in on the re-oxidation reaction within the optimal reactor framework – the counter-current reactor. It elucidates the equilibrium pathway, delineating the progression of chemical equilibrium at each incremental stage of re-oxidation. Using ceria (CeO2) as a model redox-active metal oxide, the investigation analyzes the influence of operational parameters on the re-oxidation reaction. Findings reveal the theoretical feasibility of maintaining near constant temperature (±2.5 °C) during re-oxidation, achieving a total extent of reduction of 0.038 and a hydrogen conversion yield of 32%. While near adiabatic operation is also achievable, practicality is constrained by a maximum total extent of reduction of 6.5·10−3. The study also explores the economic implications of thermochemical water splitting, particularly focusing on the steam-to-hydrogen output ratio. It highlights the severe economic hurdles associated with hydrogen yields below approximately 1%. Furthermore, the investigation reveals that the addition of inert gas to the re-oxidation step offers no significant advantages. Concluding the analysis, a comparative assessment exposes negligible differences in outcomes when substituting carbon dioxide (CO2) for water (H2O) as the oxidant in low-temperature scenarios (800 °C). This comprehensive study not only advances the understanding of re-oxidation dynamics in thermochemical water splitting but also informs practical and economic considerations crucial for the advancement of this technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calle et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: