PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2024Physics of Fluids9 citations

Scale-resolving simulations of turbulent flows with coherent structures: Toward cut-off dependent data-driven closure modeling

View Full Paper
STSalar TaghizadehSimerics (United States)FWFreddie WitherdenVaughn College of Aeronautics and TechnologySGSharath S. GirimajiTexas A&M University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Complex turbulent flows with large-scale instabilities and coherent structures pose challenges to both traditional and data-driven Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes methods. The difficulty arises due to the strong flow-dependence (the non-universality) of the unsteady coherent structures, which translates to poor generalizability of data-driven models. It is well-accepted that the dynamically active coherent structures reside in the larger scales, while the smaller scales of turbulence exhibit more “universal” (generalizable) characteristics. In such flows, it is prudent to separate the treatment of the flow-dependent aspects from the universal features of the turbulence field. Scale resolving simulations (SRS), such as the partially averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) method, seek to resolve the flow-dependent coherent scales of motion and model only the universal stochastic features. Such an approach requires the development of scale-sensitive turbulence closures that not only allow for generalizability but also exhibit appropriate dependence on the cut-off length scale. The objectives of this work are to (i) establish the physical characteristics of cut-off dependent closures in stochastic turbulence; (ii) develop a procedure for subfilter stress neural network development at different cut-offs using high-fidelity data; and (iii) examine the optimal approach for the incorporation of the unsteady features in the network for consistent a posteriori use. The scale-dependent closure physics analysis is performed in the context of the PANS approach, but the technique can be extended to other SRS methods. The benchmark “flow past periodic hills” case is considered for proof of concept. The appropriate self-similarity parameters for incorporating unsteady features are identified. The study demonstrates that when the subfilter data are suitably normalized, the machine learning based SRS model is indeed insensitive to the cut-off scale.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Taghizadeh et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66c68b6db6435875f79ffhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0207256
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited2012 · 824 citations
  2. 2MODEL REDUCTION FOR FLUIDS, USING BALANCED PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION2005 · 901 citations
  3. 3A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake2003 · 1,026 citations
  4. 4An interpretable framework of data-driven turbulence modeling using deep neural networks2021 · 137 citations
  5. 5Scientific machine learning for closure models in multiscale problems: A review2024 · 32 citations