PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2024HeliyonOpen Access

Evaluating the efficacy and suggesting technical optimizations for endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion across different lumbar spondylolisthesis types

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JTJian TongDCDengzhuo ChenJLJin Li

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Tong et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e67065b6db6435875fadachttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32576
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Single-position OLIF combined with percutaneous posterior fixation under O-arm navigation for the treatment of grade II lumbar spondylolisthesis: clinical and radiologic outcomes2025
  2. 2Clinical observation of fully visualized spinal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segment II lumbar spondylolisthesis2024
  3. 3Functional Outcome of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spondylolisthesis: An Observational Study2025
  4. 4Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Monosegmental Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for High‐Grade Spondylolisthesis: A 3‐Year Observational Study2026
  5. 5Early experience with a rapid navigation system-assisted unilateral biportal endoscopic interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis2026