Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: This study's aim was to proposal physical functional performance index based on body size standardization in older adults.METHODS: Eighty-seven eligible women were recruited to participate of this cross-sectional study. The association of body size on strength and PFP (6-walking test, chair stand test (CHT), timed up and go test, handgrip strength test, and vertical jump test) were evaluated using Pearson correlation following Fisher's r-to-z test. Contingency tables were used to show the proportion tertiles for each normalized PFP test and Body Mass Index (BMI).RESULTS: Coefficient of determination (R2) showed lower clinical measures determination (range 1% to 2.4%), while the normalized measures presented 19% to 30%. Conversely, within PFP measure (CHT, TUG, and 6-m), only CHTn presented higher determination coefficient compared with CHT (11% versus 0%, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: From a practical application view, researchers, and health care professionals involved with older adults should consider using normalized measure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bezerra et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: