We consider Bayesian estimation of a hierarchical linear model (HLM) from small sample sizes where 37 patient-physician encounters are repeatedly measured at four time points. The continuous response Y and continuous covariates C are partially observed and assumed missing at random. With C having linear effects, the HLM may be efficiently estimated by available methods. When C includes cluster-level covariates having interactive or other nonlinear effects given small sample sizes, however, maximum likelihood estimation is suboptimal, and existing Gibbs samplers are based on a Bayesian joint distribution compatible with the HLM, but impute missing values of C by a Metropolis algorithm via a proposal density having a constant variance while the target conditional distribution has a nonconstant variance. Therefore, the samplers are not guaranteed to be compatible with the joint distribution and, thus, not guaranteed to always produce unbiased estimation of the HLM. We introduce a compatible Gibbs sampler that imputes parameters and missing values directly from the exact conditional distributions. We analyze repeated measurements from patient-physician encounters by our sampler, and compare our estimators with those of existing methods by simulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: