PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2024Technovation45 citationsOpen Access

Bridging the ‘Concept–Product’ gap in new product development: Emerging insights from the application of artificial intelligence in FinTech SMEs

View Full Paper
MČMarija ČubrićFLFeng Li

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Building on the literature on the concept-product gap in new product development, we examine how FinTech SMEs are developing Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based innovations and which organisational or project factors best contribute to the acceleration of AI innovation. The empirical evidence collected from interviews with key stakeholders, practitioners' forums, and public company documents yields two distinct approaches that differ in their potential for accelerating innovation and reducing the concept-product gap. From a contingency perspective, these two approaches are expanded into four distinct development process configurations, contingent on the business development stage, reliance on 3rd party platforms, availability of high volumes of data, investment level, organisational agility, and level of novelty. The resulting process typology could be used as a diagnostic tool for FinTech SMEs interested in effectively leveraging AI innovation. Using contingency theory, we further develop these insights into a new theoretical framework to explain how AI innovation development unfolds in FinTech SMEs and the rationale for different implementations. Our new process typology and theoretical model can help researchers investigate the mechanisms underlying technological innovation processes. We further identify the specific reasons why the potential of AI for creating new services and disrupting incumbents via digital startups has not been fully realised even in contexts with significant investment and support from public and private business development programmes. This field is still rapidly evolving, and thus, new areas for future research are also highlighted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Čubrić et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e67cc0b6db643587606ce7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Building Theories from Case Study Research1989 · 16,813 citations
  2. 2A project management dictionary of terms1985 · 56 citations
  3. 3A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation1994 · 17,695 citations
  4. 4Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook1994 · 45,629 citations
  5. 5An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact1986 · 982 citations