The aqueous reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel generates a considerable amount of plutonium alongside contaminated stainless steel, necessitating meticulous handling for safe decommission and long‐term management. The present work investigated the co‐immobilization of CeO 2 (as an inactive surrogate for PuO 2 ) with metallic Fe and Cr (representing a simplified stainless steel) within a zirconolite ceramic wasteform, nominally targeting Ca 1− x Ce x ZrTi 2−2 x Fe x Cr x O 7 . After sintering at 1400°C under an air atmosphere, the zirconolite phase constituted 90.8–95.1 wt.% of the product across the solid solution range of 0.05 ≤ x ≤ 0.25, alongside perovskite and baddeleyite secondary phases in varying proportion; no evidence of the unincorporated CeO 2 or metallic and oxidized Fe or Cr were identified. Above x = 0.30 CeO 2 was detected inferring, the solubility limit was reached. A polytype transformation from zirconolite 2M to 3T was confirmed by X ‐ray diffraction and selected area electron diffraction results, with the relative fraction of the 3T phase gradually increasing to 49.5 wt.% at x = 0.30. Deconvolution of X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy data revealed the partial reduction of Ce 4+ –Ce 3+ , whereas Fe and Cr species maintained trivalent, in agreement with the targeted substitution scheme. Benefitting from the excellent chemical flexibility of zirconolite structured compounds, the co‐immobilization approach may be an effective disposal pathway for Pu‐containing wastes and contaminated stainless steel residues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: