After further review and discussions among the authors, we want to do further experiment to improve the existing premature results. Specifically, authors want to add more complex analysis to support the results. Given the importance of maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity, we believe that withdrawal is the most appropriate course of action. All authors are fully aware of this decision and have agreed to the withdrawal. We have had several rounds of correspondence regarding this matter, and all authors have been included in these communications to ensure transparency and prevent any potential disputes in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: