Cohort study demonstrates Serratia dominance and elevated diversity in patients with tuberculosis, suggesting specific microbial interactions influence mycobacterial pathogenesis.
Background Pathogenic mycobacteria, such as the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (Mtbc), and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTMs) can cause severe chronic pulmonary infections. However, not all infected patients develop active disease. Yet, it is unclear whether certain key taxa in the lung microbiome play a role in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis (TB) and NTM lung disease (LD). Material and methods We employed 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (V3-V4) to characterize the baseline microbiome in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from a patient cohort diagnosed with TB (n=23), NTM-LD (n=19), or non-infectious disease (n=4) prior to the initiation of therapy. The analysis included the depletion of human cells, removal of extracellular DNA, implementation of a decontamination strategy, and exploratory whole-metagenome sequencing (WMS) of selected specimens. Results The genera Serratia and unclassified Yersiniaceae dominated the lung microbiome of all patients with a mean relative abundance of >15% and >70%, respectively. However, at the sub-genus level, as determined by amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), TB-patients exhibited increased community diversity, and TB specific ASV_7 (unclassified Yersiniaceae ), and ASV_21 ( Serratia ) signatures. Exploratory analysis by WMS and ASV similarity analysis suggested the presence of Serratia liquefaciens , Serratia grimesii , Serratia myotis and/or Serratia quinivorans in both TB and NTM-LD patients. Overall, presence/absence of certain Serratia ASVs was significantly associated with disease state. Conclusion The lung microbiome of TB patients harbors a distinct, and heterogenous microbiome structure with specific occurrences of certain Serratia traits. Serratia sp. plays a pivotal role in our understanding of microbial interactions in the lung microbiome of patients infected with Mtbc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belheouane et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: