Automatic Assessment of Leanness of Construction Contract Provisions: A Proof-of-Concept Ramesh Balaji, Sivakumar KS, Murali Jagannathan, Venkata Santosh Kumar Delhi Pages 822-829 (2024 Proceedings of the 41st ISARC, Lille, France, ISBN 978-0-6458322-1-1, ISSN 2413-5844) Abstract: Construction projects significantly contribute to a nation's economic development. However, the sector is synonymous with delays and disputes for various reasons, often due to non-productive work practices. Researchers and practitioners recommend applying lean construction principles to mitigate non-value addition activities and improve productivity and performance. However, existing contract forms may contain provisions that are counter-productive, thereby making lean implementation a challenge. Therefore, when planning to go lean, it becomes important to assess the extent to which a contract provision aids or hinders lean implementation, in other words, 'leanness' assessment. A manual analysis is possible but time-consuming and prone to subjective decision-making. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-backed Language Model (LM)-based tools can be potentially used to quickly and efficiently classify a contract clause based on lean implementation-friendliness. Therefore, a dataset containing 734 contract clauses is manually classified into 14 labels based on the literature review, and a part of this data is used to train Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-LM. With an F1 score of 77%, the study shows that LM-based solutions can be potentially employed for construction contract leanness assessment. The study, which is an initial attempt towards developing a reliable leanness prediction model in the future, also noted that the Bert-base-cased LM performs better than its 'large' counterpart under both the 'cased' and 'uncased' conditions. Keywords: Contracts, Lean, Language Models, Finetuning, Artificial Intelligence DOI: https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2024/0107 Download fulltext Download BibTex Download Endnote (RIS) TeX Import to Mendeley
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balaji et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: