Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research demonstrates gradual pollen release in Solanum rostratum during bumblebee visits, suggesting implications for pollen presentation theory.
The rate at which flowers dispense pollen across successive pollinator visits is a key functional trait influencing male reproductive success. Pollen presentation theory (PPT) predicts that when pollinators are abundant and actively groom their bodies to collect pollen, plants should evolve gradual pollen release. Despite its intuitive appeal and generality, PPT has rarely been tested empirically using real bee visits, especially in buzz‐pollinated plants where pollen dispensing is controlled mechanically. Buzz‐pollinated plants are ideal to study PPT because they are often nectarless and rely on pollen‐grooming bees, which must apply vibrations to specialised tube‐like or poricidal anthers to release pollen. The vibrations generated by some bees directly determine pollen release and thus yield a direct mapping between bee behaviour and floral function. Here, we provide the first quantitative assessment of pollen dispensing in a buzz‐pollinated plant, Solanum rostratum , using real bumblebee ( Bombus terrestris ) visits. We conducted 80 trials with individual bees and measured over 2000 pollination buzzes to estimate the relationship between total buzzing time and pollen dosing. Individual pollination buzzes had a fundamental frequency of 340 ± 26 Hz (mean ± SD) and were relatively short in duration (0.748 ± 0.604 s). We found that S. rostratum shows a strong pattern of gradual pollen release with flowers dispensing on average 2%–4% of the available pollen grains for each buzzing second. Our study links an ecologically relevant pollinator behaviour to a key floral functional trait that affects male fitness, offering empirical support for PPT in a buzz‐pollinated system. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vallejo‐Marín et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: