Late nephrectomy in infants with congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type

Aim Bilateral nephrectomy is commonly performed in patients with congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type. The optimal timing of nephrectomy is unclear. Methods Growth, thromboembolic events, infections, transplant‐related complications and ability to eat were compared between infants with early (Group 1, n = 13) and late (Group 2, n = 10) nephrectomy. ‘Early’ was defined as nephrectomy at 7‐kg body weight followed by peritoneal dialysis and ‘late’ as nephrectomy at ≥10 kg followed by 3–4 weeks of haemodialysis and kidney transplantation. Patients were followed until the end of the first post‐transplant year. Results Dialysis time was significantly longer in group 1 than in group 2. Late nephrectomy did not increase the risk for thromboembolic events or septicaemia but decreased tube feeding dependency (group 1 69% vs. group 2 20%, p = 0.019). Motor development at transplantation was considered normal in 80% of the infants with late nephrectomy compared to 31% in the early nephrectomy group ( p = 0.019); however, the difference between the groups disappeared by the end of the follow‐up. Conclusion Infants with late nephrectomy have comparative outcome but less feeding tube dependency and better motor development during the first post‐transplant months compared to infants with early nephrectomy.