Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: OSCE-GPT (https://learnmedicine.ca/) is an AI-based app that integrates history, physical exam, and relevant components for case guidance across medical disciplines to help trainees improve clinical skills. With global users across 60+ countries, this preliminary quality improvement study gathers user feedback on neurology and otolaryngology cases. Methods: A survey was distributed to users at the University of Ottawa and Cumming School of Medicine. Participants provided insights on the app’s use, perceived benefits, and suggested improvements. Results: Using 5-point Likert scales, 13 respondents, 9 of which evaluated an otolaryngology case, rated the overall usefulness of the learning tool 4.57± 0.51 (1=very poor, 5=very good), with a score of 4.00±0.65 relative to other teaching methods, such as didactic lectures or grand rounds (1=much worse, 5=much better). Users noted realistic interactions and self-paced learning as beneficial factors. Areas for improvement included a more fluid transition between physical exams and history, geographic variations in cases, and the addition of elements such as non-verbal patient cues or emotional. Conclusions: This study demonstrates utility of OSCE-GPT for medical trainees, particularly for otolaryngology and neurology cases. As cases continue to be added, feedback will be implemented to further improve user experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramchandani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: