Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: LC-FAOD may be missed in neuromuscular (NM) clinics due to its rarity and absence from common NM genetic panels. The Canadian Neuromuscular Disease Registry (CNDR) collects real-world patient data and includes a network of clinician-investigators. Our objective was to inform future registry work by evaluating diagnosis pathways for LC-FAOD patients and estimating the number followed at Canadian NM clinics. Methods: A questionnaire was developed with an expert committee and circulated to 111 CNDR-affiliated NM neurologists. Results: 12 neurologists in 5 provinces, primarily adult-treating (n=8) completed the survey (10.8% response rate). Eleven (91.7%) practiced for >10 years. Agreement trends existed between definition of, and tests to evaluate, rhabdomyolysis. Four clinics routinely follow LC-FAOD patients. In the last 1-2 years, respondents diagnosed approximately 91 patients with LC-FAOD (mean=7.5 per clinic). 83.3% never received continuing education on LC-FAOD, though 75% indicated interest in expert-led webinars. Further data will be presented. Conclusions: Low sample size limits conclusions about LC-FAOD clinical trends. Results suggest LC-FAOD may be under-diagnosed or not routinely followed by NM specialists, limiting viability of an LC-FAOD registry. Practitioners may be interested in LC-FAOD-specific education. Future work could include collaboration with metabolic geneticists on education initiatives to raise awareness and improve care for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kassardjian et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: