Biodegradable Polymer Versus Polymer-Free Ultrathin Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Analysis of the Stent Arm Registry From the HOST-IDEA Randomized Trial

Jung‐Kyu Han; Seokhun Yang; Doyeon Hwang; Sang-Hyeon Park; Jeehoon Kang; Han‐Mo Yang; Kyung Woo Park; Hyun‐Jae Kang; Bon‐Kwon Koo; Jin Man Cho; Jang-Hyun Cho; Duk Won Bang; Jae‐Hwan Lee; Han Cheol Lee; Kyung-Jin Kim; Woo Jung Chun; Won‐Woo Seo; Woo Jung Park; Sang Min Park; Jin Won Kim; Hyo‐Soo Kim

doi:10.1161/circinterventions.123.013585

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of each third-generation drug-eluting stent with ultrathin struts and advanced polymer technology remain unclear. We investigated the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention using the Coroflex ISAR polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) or Orsiro biodegradable polymer SES.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Han et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e68995b6db643587611e97 https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.123.013585

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Biodegradable Polymer Versus Polymer-Free Ultrathin Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Analysis of the Stent Arm Registry From the HOST-IDEA Randomized Trial

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Biodegradable Polymer Versus Polymer-Free Ultrathin Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Analysis of the Stent Arm Registry From the HOST-IDEA Randomized Trial

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

More related papers

More from Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions

Keep reading

More related papers

More from Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions