Systematic review reveals pervasive paradoxical tensions between bureaucratic and postbureaucratic features in public administration, highlighting a reconciliatory framework for governance.
The relation between bureaucracy and postbureaucracy sparks debate within public administration (PA), typically conceptualized as a 'simplistic' replacement of alternative paradigms. However, scholars argued for the coexistence of bureaucratic and postbureaucratic features in PAs, which may foster paradoxical tensions. This article contributes to this debate adopting a paradox lens, and by employing the PRISMA methodology to systematize literature on PA-paradoxes, and their relation to bureaucracy and postbureaucracy. The findings reveal the pervasiveness of PA paradoxes and their relation to bureaucracy-post-bureaucracy contraposition. Therefore, this paper enriches the traditional conceptualization of bureaucracy and post-bureaucracy with a more reconciliatory approach through paradoxical lens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ingaggiati et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: