Abstract results (i) resource decentralization and expenditure decentralization reduce the size of the central public sector, while tax decentralization increases it; (ii) fiscal decentralization (resources, expenditure and taxes) tends to increase the size of the local public sector, suggesting the existence of a local Leviathan in sub-Saharan Africa. Thus, as Brennan and Buchanan (1980) suggested, decentralized countries have less expensive national public sectors. However, as Oates (1985) and Wallis and Oates (1988) suspected, the allocation of a wider range of functions to government in the event of decentralization suggests a positive association between greater fiscal decentralization and the size of the local public sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ASNGAR et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: