The economic viability of using summer-seeded legume cover crops (crimson clover, red clover, and hairy vetch) as a primary nitrogen (N) source for an organic corn ( Zea mays L.)–soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.)–winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) rotation was determined on a sandy loam soil in southwestern Ontario, Canada, by comparing gross profit for organic production (organic sources of N and phosphorus, no herbicides) to conventional production (no cover crops, synthetic fertilizers and herbicides added). Profits were determined for the initial 3-year transition period from conventional to organic production (2015–2017), and for 5 years of certified organic production (2018–2022). During the transition period when conventional crop prices applied to both production systems, organic production profits (CAD $1148–$1869 ha −1 per rotation) were lower than conventional profits (CAD $2126 ha −1 per rotation). During the certified organic period when price premiums were applied, organic soybean and corn profits (CAD $1995–$2274 ha −1 and $2819–$3195 ha −1 per year, respectively) were significantly greater than conventional soybean and corn profits (CAD $536 ha −1 and $1926 per ha −1 , respectively). Winter wheat profits were slightly higher for organic production (CAD $426–$825 ha −1 per year) than for conventional production (CAD $371 ha −1 per year). During the certified organic production period, profits from the 3-year rotations were CAD $5533–$6153 ha −1 for organic production, and CAD $2860 ha −1 for conventional production. It was concluded that an organic rotation of corn–soybean–winter wheat/legume cover crop can be economically viable and more profitable than conventional production on sandy loam soil in southwestern Ontario.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: