Hospitalization rates for elderly patients with dyspnea are increasing. Concurrently, the radiologist shortage challenges the initial diagnosis of acute heart failure, as the diagnosis often relies on chest X-ray evaluation. ChatGPT-4 is easily available with image interpreter features, making it a tempting supplementary tool for radiology analysis. We aimed to examine ChatGPT-4’s ability to correctly detect pulmonary congestion on chest X-rays compared to two thoracic radiologists. In a prospective observational single-center study, acute dyspneic patients were examined with chest X-rays within 4 hours of admission. For 50 chest X-rays, two blinded thoracic radiologists evaluated the likelihood of pulmonary congestion on a 5-point Likert scale. Similarly, ChatGPT-4 was prompted to evaluate the chest X-rays for pulmonary congestion, first independently, then with clinical information about medical history, clinical examination, vital parameters, and electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythm. ChatGPT-4 matched the radiologists’ evaluations with a ≤1 point discrepancy in 27 (54%) of the chest X-rays. The match rate slightly improved to 31 (62%) with provided clinical information. ChatGPT-4 accurately identified pulmonary congestion in 12 (48%) of 25 chest X-rays with pulmonary congestion and correctly detected its absence in 15 (60%) of 25 images without pulmonary congestion. In conclusion, the image interpreter features of ChatGPT-4 do not yet support reliable diagnostics of pulmonary congestion on chest X-rays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olesen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: