Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The 2021 Nobel Prize in Economics recognized a theory of causal inference, which deserves more attention from philosophers. To that end, I develop a dialectic that extends the Lewis-Stalnaker debate on a logical principle called Conditional Excluded Middle (CEM). I first play the good cop for CEM, and give a new argument for it: a Quine-Putnam indispensability argument based on the Nobel-Prize winning theory. But then I switch sides and play the bad cop: I undermine that argument with a new theory of causal inference that preserves the success of the original theory but dispenses with CEM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanti Lin (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: