In this study, we first establish that gravity models incorporating matter-related terms, such as f(Lₘ), f(g_μνT^μν), and f(T_μνT^μν), into the usual matter Lagrangian density Lₘ, are equivalent to general relativity (GR) with nonminimal matter interactions. Through the redefinition Lₘ+f→Lₘᵗᵒᵗ, these models are exactly GR, yet the usual material field T_μν and its accompanying partner, namely, the modification field T_μνᵐᵒᵈ, engage in nonminimal interactions. Specifically, ${{∇}}^{{μ}}{T}_{{μ}{ν}}={-}{Q}_{{ν}}={-}{{∇}}^{{μ}}{T}_{{μ}{ν}}ᵐᵒᵈ$, where ${Q}_{{ν}}$ is the interaction kernel that governs the rate of energy transfer. Our focus narrows on the specific model of $f({T}_{{μ}{ν}}{T}^{{μ}{ν}})$, known as energy-momentum squared gravity (EMSG), where the usual material field ${T}_{{μ}{ν}}$ is accompanied by an energy-momentum squared field (EMSF), ${T}_{{μ}{ν}}ᵉᵐˢᶠ$, along with a sui generis nonminimal interaction between them. We demonstrate that a particular ${T}_{{μ}{ν}}ᵉᵐˢᶠ$ can be introduced by removing ${{{∂}}²{L}ₘ}{{∂}{g}^{{μ}{ν}}{∂}{g}^{{σ}{ε}}}$ (the new term emerging in models that incorporate scalars formed from ${T}_{{μ}{ν}}$), thanks to the freedom in determining the interaction kernel, but this approach compromises the Lagrangian formulation of EMSG. Additionally, we address the ambiguities regarding the perfect fluid stemming from this new term. We show the proper way of calculating this term for a perfect fluid, revealing that it is indeed nonzero, contrary to common assumption in the literature. Finally, we reexamine cosmological models within the realm of EMSG, offering new insights into the applicability and interpretation of our findings in EMSG and similar theoretical frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akarsu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: