Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of seated, supine, and recumbent postures on nasal resistance in individuals with allergic rhinitis (AR) and healthy controls, which has not been investigated in the past. Methods: A visual analog scale (VAS) assessed subjective nasal obstruction, while acoustic rhinometry and video endoscopy provided objective measures. Sixty participants, comprising 30 AR patients and 30 healthy controls, were evaluated across 4 postures without decongestion: seated, supine, left recumbent, and right recumbent. Results: In patients with AR, we noted no significant changes in subjective nasal blockage under various postures (all P > .18). However, significant reductions of minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA) were found (seated vs supine, P = .014; seated vs left recumbent, P = .001; seated vs right recumbent, P < .001) and significant increases in the inferior turbinate hypertrophy were observed on the dependent side of the nose when in recumbent posture (right nose: seated vs right recumbent, P = .013; left nose: seated vs left recumbent, P = .003). On the contrary, healthy controls experienced increased subjective nasal obstruction (VAS scores: seated vs supine, P < .001; seated vs left recumbent, P = .003; seated vs right recumbent, P < .001), reductions in mCSA (seated vs supine, P = .002; seated vs right or left recumbent, both P = .001), and increased inferior turbinate hypertrophy on the dependent side of the nose (right nose: seated vs right recumbent, P = .003; left nose: seated vs left recumbent, P = .006). Conclusions: Healthy controls reported better nasal patency when shifting from supine or recumbent to more upright or less gravity-dependent seated postures, which was further supported by objective examinations. On the contrary, despite patients with AR not subjectively perceiving increased nasal patency while adopting more upright postures, objective evaluations demonstrated an improvement in their nasal airflow in these less gravity-dependent postures. Level of Evidence: 4
Lo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.