Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the longitudinal, retrospective study, the ability of the FRAX, Garvan, and POL-RISK algorithms to predict osteoporotic fractures was compared in a group of 457 women. Using the rigid threshold of 10% showed a significant discrepancy in sensitivity and specificity of all tools. New thresholds for high risk of fractures were established for each calculator separately: 6.3% for FRAX major fracture, 20.0% for Garvan any fracture, and 18.0% for POL-RISK any fracture. Such thresholds allow for improving the diagnostic accuracy of all three calculators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pluskiewicz et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: