PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2024Measurement Science and Technology10 citationsOpen Access

Influence of Cement and Water Content on the Multifaceted Capabilities of a Self-Sensing Cement-based Geocomposite: A Comprehensive Analysis

View Full Paper
MAMohammadmahdi AbediSultan Qaboos UniversityMRMohammad Jawed RoshanUniversity of MinhoMAMostafa AdresiShahid Rajaee Teacher Training University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the synergistic effects of cement, water, and hybrid carbon nanotubes/graphene nanoplatelets (CNT/GNP) concentrations on the mechanical, microstructural, durability, and piezoresistive properties of self-sensing cementitious geocomposites. Varied concentrations of cement (8% to 18%), water (8% to 16%), and CNT/GNP (0.1% to 0.34%, 1:1) were incorporated into cementitious stabilized sand (CSS). Mechanical characterization involved compression and flexural tests, while microstructural analysis utilized dry density, apparent porosity, water absorption, and non-destructive ultrasonic testing, alongside TGA, SEM, EDS, and x-ray diffraction analyses. The durability of the composite was also assessed against 180 Freeze-thaw cycles. Moreover, the piezoresistive behavior of the nano-reinforced CSS was analyzed during cyclic flexural and compressive loading using the four-probe method. The optimal carbon nanomaterials (CNM) content was found to depend on the water and cement ratios. Generally, elevating the water content led to a rise in the CNM optimal concentration, primarily attributed to improved dispersion and adequate water for the cement hydration process. The maximum increments in flexural and compressive strengths, compared to plain CSS, were significant, reaching up to approximately 30% for flexural strength and 41% for compressive strength, for the specimen containing 18% cement, 12% water, and 0.17% CNM. This improvement was attributed to the nanoparticles’ pore-filling function, acceleration of hydration, regulation of free water, and facilitation of crack-bridging mechanisms in the geocomposite. Further decreases in cement and water content adversely impacted the piezoresistive performance of the composite. Notably, specimens containing 8% cement (across all water content variations) and 10% cement (with 8% and 12% water content) showed a lack of piezoresistive responses. In contrast, specimens containing 14% and 18% cement displayed substantial sensitivity, evidenced by elevated gauge factors, under loading conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abedi et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e69c24b6db643587621269https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ad4c89
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Studies on optimization of silica nanoparticles dosage in cementitious system2016 · 105 citations
  2. 2The effect of Persian Gulf tidal zone exposure on durability of mixes containing silica fume and blast furnace slag2008 · 88 citations
  3. 3Seismic analysis of segmental shallow tunnels adjacent to building foundations under soil liquefaction and its mitigation2024 · 23 citations
  4. 4Nano-carbon black and carbon fiber as conductive materials for the diagnosing of the damage of concrete beam2013 · 163 citations
  5. 5Effect of Silicon Carbide Nano Dispersion on the Mechanical and Nano Structural Properties of Cement2015 · 47 citations