Simulating turbulent flows in complex real-life geometries faces two major problems.First, direct simulation of turbulent flow is extremely costly.Second, a complex geometry-conforming mesh is required, and such mesh presumably suffers from several mesh-quality related problems lowering the solution accuracy and prolonging the simulation time.To solve the first problem, phenomenological turbulence models based on, e.g.Reynolds-averaging, are commonly utilized.To address the second one, a variant of an immersed boundary (IB) method can be used where the complex geometry is projected onto a simple mesh by an indicator field and adjustment of governing equations.Consequently, a connection of Reynolds-averaging and an immersed boundary method shall resolve both the problems and provide a simulation approach favorable for e.g.optimizations.However, such a connection is not common.In this contribution, we utilize our custom IB variant, the hybrid fictitious domain-immersed boundary method (HFDIB) and aim on extending the HFDIB by tools of the Reynolds-averaged simulation (RAS).In comparison with standard simulation approaches, the new HFDIB-RAS approach shows acceptable results in wide range of flow Reynolds numbers and in several testing geometries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kubíčková et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: