The article discusses cases related to the continuation of the exercise of powers by a judge when committing a crime. The author analyzes the practice of professional activity of judges convicted of criminal acts, immediately before or after their commission. At the same time, typical situations for intentional and careless criminal acts are systematized, legislative possibilities that impede the judge’s exercise of powers to administer justice after the commission of a crime are analyzed, conclusions are drawn about the need to improve legislation in order to preserve the criterion of justice of judicial acts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Natalya V. Romanenko (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: