A 19-year-old with trisomy 21, autism spectrum disorder, developmental delays, and foreign body (FB) ingestions was followed by pediatric gastroenterology for chronic retentive constipation. The family contacted gastroenterology for concern of fecal impaction. The nonverbal patient was described as "off" with poor sleep, inappetence, and eructation. The patient had no fevers or emesis. Family endorsed daily encopresis and enuresis per baseline. Given a history of declining exams and after shared-decision making, the provider obtained an abdominal X-ray (AXR) to evaluate stool burden. The AXR was notable for a radiopaque FB consistent with a steak knife measuring 23 cm in length, obliquely oriented and likely within the stomach, extending into the duodenum without pneumoperitoneum (Figure 1). There was a moderate amount of stool in the colon. Endoscopic removal was considered, but thought to pose a risk of injury to the esophagus and posterior pharynx during removal of the knife. The patient was therefore admitted for an exploratory laparotomy with gastrotomy and FB removal. The patient remained inpatient for 6 days and diet was advanced after fluoroscopic imaging demonstrated no upper gastrointestinal leak. There have been no additional FB ingestions. It is important to consider a broad differential for gastrointestinal complaints and to specifically ask about FB ingestions, including button batteries, magnets, and chemical ingestions.1 Most FB spontaneously pass (90%) with few requiring surgical intervention (<1%).2, 3 The decision between endoscopic versus surgical removal should be made within a multidisciplinary team pending the FB object, location, and duration in the gastrointestinal tract.4 The authors declare no conflict of interest. Consent by the parents of the patient has been obtained; they are aware of and agree with the intent for this article to be published.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corrado et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: