This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background PD-L1 intrinsically promotes tumor progression through multiple mechanisms, which potentially leads to resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. The intrinsic effect of PD-L1 on breast cancer (BC) cell proliferation has not been fully elucidated. Methods we used proteomics, gene expression knockdown (KD), quantitative immunofluorescence (qIF), western blots, functional assays including colony-forming assay (CFA) and real-time cell analyzer (RTCA), and in vivo data using immunohistochemistry in breast cancer patients . Results PD-L1 promoted BC cell proliferation by accelerating cell cycle entry at the G1-to-S phase transition. Global proteomic analysis of the differentially expressed nuclear proteins indicated the involvement of several proliferation-related molecules, including p21 CIP1/WAF1 . Western blotting and qIF demonstrated the higher expression of SKP2 and the lower expression of p21 CIP1/WAF1 and p27 Kip1 in PD-L1 expressing (PD-L1 pos ) cells as compared to PD-L1 KD (PD-L1 KD ) cells. Xenograft-derived cells and the TCGA BC dataset confirmed this relationship in vivo. Functionally, CFA and RTCA demonstrated the central role of SKP2 in promoting PD-L1-mediated proliferation. Finally, immunohistochemistry in 74 breast cancer patients confirmed PD-L1 and SKP-p21/p27 axis relationship, as it showed a highly statistically significant correlation between SKP2 and PD-L1 expression ( p < 0.001), and both correlated significantly with the proliferation marker Ki-67 ( p < 0.001). On the other hand, there was a statistically significant inverse relationship between PD-L1 and p21 CIP1/WAF1 expression ( p = 0.005). Importantly, double negativity for p21 CIP1/WAF1 and p27 Kip1 correlated significantly with PD-L1 ( p < 0.001), SKP2 ( p = 0.002), and Ki-67 ( p = 0.002). Conclusions we have demonstrated the role of the SKP2-p27/p21 axis in intrinsic PD-L1-enhanced cell cycle progression. Inhibitors of SKP2 expression can alleviate resistance to ICPIs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elfoly et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: