This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Abstract Background Acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) of the breast is a rare subtype of breast cancer. It was regarded as a low-grade triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with the potential to progress or transform to a high-grade lesion due to the molecular similarities with conventional aggressive TNBC in several genetic studies. Microscopically, the coexistence of classical low-grade and high-grade triple-negative components in breast AciCC is not uncommon. Nevertheless, the comparative histopathological and genetic study on both components is rarely reported at present. Case Presentation We present the case of a 34-year-old woman diagnosed initially on the preoperative biopsy with malignant small round cell tumor (undifferentiated or poorly differentiated carcinoma) that was later identified as breast AciCC with a high-grade solid component. The breast AciCC consisted of a classical acinic component and a high-grade component. The high-grade lesion in the tumor showed a solid sheet-like pattern characterized by large, round, pleomorphic or vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, frequent mitotic activities. Classical acinic architectures focally merged together to form solid nests and underwent a gradual transition into high-grade areas. Notably, in the high-grade lesion, conventional immunochemical markers for breast AciCC, such as, AAT, EMA, CK, SOX10, S100, GATA3, Periodic acid–Schiff-diastase (PASD), E-cadherin were lost while CyclinD1, Vimentin were diffusely expressed. Next‑generation sequencing (NGS) analysis revealed that 43.5% of variants were identical in both classical and high-grade components. Additionally, PAK5 mutation, copy number loss of CDH1, CHEK1, MLH1, copy number gains of CDK6, HGF, FOXP1 were identified in the high-grade component. Conclusions The case offers a comparative analysis of the histopathology and genetic characteristics of classical low-grade and high-grade components within the same breast AciCC. This may serve as a morphological and molecular basis for further investigation into the molecular mechanisms underlying high-grade lesions in breast AciCC.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: