Purpose Magnetization transfer saturation (MT sat ) mapping is commonly used to examine the macromolecular content of brain tissue. This study compared variable flip angle (VFA) T 1 mapping against compressed‐sensing MP2RAGE (csMP2RAGE) T 1 mapping for accelerating MT sat imaging. Methods VFA, MP2RAGE, and csMP2RAGE were compared against inversion‐recovery T 1 in an aqueous phantom at 3 T. The same 1‐mm VFA, MP2RAGE, and csMP2RAGE protocols were acquired in 4 healthy subjects to compare T 1 and MT sat . Bloch‐McConnell simulations were used to investigate differences between the phantom and in vivo T 1 results. Ten healthy controls were imaged twice with the csMP2RAGE MT sat protocol to quantify repeatability. Results The MP2RAGE and csMP2RAGE protocols were 13.7% and 32.4% faster than the VFA protocol, respectively. At these scan times, all approaches provided strong repeatability and accurate T 1 times (< 5% difference) in the phantom, but T 1 accuracy was more impacted by T 2 for VFA than for MP2RAGE. In vivo, VFA estimated longer T 1 times than MP2RAGE and csMP2RAGE. Simulations suggest that the differences in the T 1 measured using VFA, MP2RAGE, and inversion recovery could be explained by the magnetization‐transfer effects. In the test–retest experiment, we found that the csMP2RAGE has a minimum detectable change of 2.3% for T 1 mapping and 7.8% for MT sat imaging. Conclusions We demonstrated that MP2RAGE can be used in place of VFA T 1 mapping in an MT sat protocol. Furthermore, a shorter scan time and high repeatability can be achieved using the csMP2RAGE sequence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rowley et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: