We present a new complementation construction for nondeterministic automata on finite trees. The traditional complementation involves determinization of the corresponding bottom-up automaton (recall that top-down deterministic automata are less powerful than nondeterministic automata, whereas bottom-up deterministic automata are equally powerful). The construction works directly in a top-down fashion, therefore without determinization. The main advantages of this construction are: (i) in the special case of finite words it boils down to the standard subset construction (which is not the case of the traditional bottom-up complementation construction), and (ii) it illustrates the core argument of the complementation lemma for infinite trees, central in the proof of Rabin's tree theorem, in a simpler setting where issues related to acceptance conditions over infinite words and determinacy of infinite games are not present.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laurent Doyen (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: