Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the doctrine of criminal procedure, it is often allowed to mix the concepts of protection and representation. Such an interpretation of them is hardly appropriate, since each of them covers an independent form of legal assistance. The third form of legal assistance (a lawyer of another person: a lawyer of a witness or a person whose premises are being searched) is rarely even mentioned at all. At the same time, the difference between these forms has a historical background, which can be verified by plunging, respectively, into the history of their origin and development. This article just offers an excursion into the history of this issue. The authors come to the conclusion that each of the forms of legal assistance is independent, has individual characteristics, and combining them in one concept of “protection” or “representation” has no valid grounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vdovtsev et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: