We present mosaic distal 10q deletion at prenatal diagnosis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome. A 40-year-old, gravida 2, para 0, woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY, del(10) (q26.13)[6]/46,XY[17]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes showed 35% mosaicism for the 10q26.13q26.3 deletion. At 22 weeks of gestation, she underwent cordocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,del(10) (q26.13)[16]/46,XY[24]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. At 24 weeks of gestation, she was referred for genetic counseling, and repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,del(10) (q26.13)[4]/46,XY[22]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Molecular genetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed no uniparental disomy (UPD) 10 by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), arr 10q26.13q26.3 × 1.6 (40% mosaicism) by aCGH, and 29.8% (31/104 cells) mosaicism for the distal 10q deletion by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a phenotypically normal 2,900-g male baby was delivered at 39 weeks of gestation. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XY,del(10) (q26.13)[6]/46,XY[34], and both the umbilical cord and the placenta had the karyotype of 46,XY. When follow-up at age four months, the neonate was normal in phenotype and development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 46,XY,del(10) (q26.13)[5]/46,XY[35], and interphase FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells showed 8% (8/102 cells) mosaicism for distal 10q deletion. Mosaic distal 10q deletion with a normal cell line at prenatal diagnosis can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: