Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper offers some provocations regarding the contemporary globalisation of dementia research. I begin with a brief account of the late 20th-century genesis of the dementia research economy in the US and subsequent initiatives to extend that research across the majority world. I then trouble this political movement. I consider racialisation in dementia research as a parallel process to globalisation, with minoritised groups being positioned as new subjects for moral and knowledge claims regarding dementia. I suggest resonances with critiques of the global mental health movement as a technology of coloniality, which I argue are relevant to the current globalisation of dementia research. I contend that majority world populations are being positioned – scientifically and morally – as new research sites and as examples of why Anglo-American approaches to dementia are superior. These parallels require critical gerontologists to ask who is benefiting from the globalisation of dementia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Rupert Fletcher (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: