Harvesting energy via tidal stream turbines is being increasingly considered as a renewable energy resource in estuaries with strong tidal currents. It remains unclear how localized energy extraction changes basic tidal physics throughout real systems. Here, we analyze the influence of an extensive synthetic tidal turbine array on barotropic tides in the Salish Sea, a complex, tidally energetic estuary, using a realistic numerical model. Tidal energy fluxes are calculated at 15 sections throughout the system and decomposed into incident and reflected components, as well as by frequency. Results show the dominant semidiurnal constituent, M 2 , controls the total tidal energy flux everywhere. When turbines are placed in Tacoma Narrows, the M 2 energy flux is enhanced at sections seaward of the array in Puget Sound and reduced landward. The principal diurnal constituent, K 1 , contributes little to the total energy flux, but behaves similarly. Changes to each constituent are primarily attributed to turbine enhanced frictional dissipation which reduces the estuary's natural resonant period (∼10 hr) amplification. Being close to the semidiurnal frequencies, the resonance adjustment reduces M 2 tidal reflection seaward of the turbines and free surface amplitude (particularly landward of the turbines) thereby increasing (decreasing) tidal energy fluxes at seaward (landward) locations. K 1 is further from the natural frequency and insensitive to resonance changes. We hypothesize K 1 is directly sensitive to increased frictional dissipation which acts to reduce reflection and tidal amplitude, regardless of the estuary natural frequency. Spatial variability in dynamics is discussed, as well as potential environmental implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spicer et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: