PURPOSE: So far etiology and risk factors associated to BIA-ALCL are only hypothesized. We aimed to identify variables significant for development. METHODS: an age-adjusted (±5 years) case-control (1:4) study (level II evidence) of 89 diagnosed BIA-ALCL cases (39±13 years) and 310 breast implant control patients (46±10 years), was conducted. Eighty clinical, demographic and life-style variables were analyzed by a conditional logistic regression to estimate their odds. RESULTS: All patients had an history of at least one exposition to implants roughness higher than 10µm. No association was observed between BI manufacturer (p=0.21). Replacement was associated with 43% lower odds (0.57, 95%CI 0.37-0.86). BI volume was positively associated with BIA-ALCL (per 100cc 1.65, 1.22-2.21). Compared to cosmetic augmentation, BIA-ALCL was less likely to occur in post-oncologic patients (0.01, 0.001-0.03). History of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy showed respectively 88% (0.12, 0.06-0.23), 69% (0.31, 0.15-0.64) and 91% (0.09, 0.05-0.18) lower odds. Women who had stopped smoking were 39% less likely to have BIA-ALCL compared to smokers (0.61, 0.38-0.87). Autoimmune co-morbidities were associated with 2-times higher odds (2.01, 95%CI 0.76-5.35) and Hashimoto's Thyroiditis with 2,5-times higher odds (2.57, 95%CI 0.69-9.17). CONCLUSION: We confirm no BIA-ALC cases with history of implants with roughness only lower than 10µm. We could first demonstrate that BIA-ALCL more likely occurs in patients with higher implants volume, autoimmune co-morbidities, or cosmetic indication. While it occurs less likely with post-oncologic patients, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy and smoking abstention and with one or more replacements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pompeo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: