INTRODUCTION & AIMS Miscarriage is the most common adverse pregnancy outcome, with up to 36% of women reporting a miscarriage by 40-45 years old. While physical activity is known for its benefits on physical and mental health in various population, the evidence in women following a miscarriage is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the study is to identify current practice and advice on physical activity following a miscarriage, assess current physical activity levels and to identify women’s attitudes to physical activity following a miscarriage. Women’s willingness to participate in future studies on the benefits of physical activity following miscarriage was also examined. METHODS A cross-sectional survey consisting of 21 questions across 5 subsections including demographics, pregnancy loss experience, physical activity advice, physical activity participation and research participation was used. Participation was opened to all Australian women who had ever experienced a miscarriage. RESULTS A total of 77 surveys were complete and suitable for analysis. Most participants (82%, n=63) reported receiving no physical activity guidance following their miscarriages and said they would like physical activity advice specific to their experiences (84%, n=65). The proportion of women who do not meet the recommended physical activity guideline increase from pre-pregnancy (32%) to following a miscarriage (83%) and continues to be higher (58%) than it was pre-pregnancy. The most frequently identified barriers to physical activity was feeling mentally/emotionally unprepared (34%, n=51). Majority of participants (68%, n=52) were willing to participate in future studies on the benefits of physical activity for women post-miscarriage. CONCLUSION This study strongly supports the need for further research into appropriate physical activity guidelines for women following a miscarriage. There is a clear unmet need in this population who are being disadvantaged by the current lack of support and guidance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edwards et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: