INTRODUCTION: Travel restrictions from the COVID-19 pandemic required residency programs to transition from an in-person to virtual interview process. Obtaining an obstetrics and gynecology residency position is known to be competitive and places a considerable financial burden on applicants. This study aims to quantify the total costs in the application process before and after virtual interviews were implemented. METHODS: The Texas STAR database was queried to identify obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants from 2019 to 2023. The primary outcome was applicant-reported spending on the residency application process. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to evaluate for associations with sociodemographic, temporal, and geographic factors. RESULTS: A total of 2,315 obstetrics and gynecology applicants were included. Applicants reported significantly less average total spending on the residency application process after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the years prior ($2,515 [SD 2,055] versus $4,909 [SD 2,869]; P <.001). Applicants who identified as underrepresented in medicine ( P =.022), had a DO degree ( P <.001), completed a research year ( P =.030), participated in the couples match ( P <.001), or were from the Western region ( P <.001) reported significantly more total spending. There was a significant positive correlation between total non-interview-related spending and the number of interviews received ( P <.001). CONCLUSION: There was a significant reduction in applicant spending after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, likely related to transition to virtual interviews and limitations on in-person away rotations. The association of applicant spending with the number of interview offers raises concern for possible equity implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manorot et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: