BACKGROUND: Unlike pulse pressure variation (PPV), the Plethysmographic Variability Index (PVI) has shown limited and heterogenous reliability in predicting fluid responsiveness, especially during dynamic intraoperative periods.METHODS: This retrospective study assessed the accuracy of PVI in predicting high PPV (>13%) using high resolution vital records acquired during neurosurgery. In addition, a new set of cut-off values of PVI for predicting PPV >13% was derived using a gray-zone approach. This study included consecutive patients who underwent neurosurgery with both PPV and PVI monitoring in a single operating room. Vital data from each individual were aggregated after 1000 repeated random samplings to generate a pooled data set. The discriminative power of PVI was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A new set of cut-offs was derived, in which sensitivity or specificity was ≥0.90.RESULTS: A total of 730,000 seconds of data from 73 patients were analyzed. The Spearman correlation co-efficient between PPV and PVI in the pooled data set was 0.356 and repeated measures correlation was 0.199. The optimal cut-off of PVI for >13% PPV was 14.5, with a sensitivity of 0.67 and a specificity of 0.70 (area under the ROC curve [AUC] 0.739). The newly determined lower and upper cut-offs for the gray-zone approach were 9 and 21, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: A single cut-off value of PVI may not accurately predict fluid responsiveness. Using a gray-zone approach, PVI <9 or >21 can rule in or rule out high PPV and may be more useful in actual clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: