Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Older female (OF) adults have the highest risk for hypertension and cardiovascular disease among any demographic in America. Therefore, there is a need to better understand the contributors to impaired blood pressure (BP) regulation in female aging. Bursts of spontaneously occurring muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) contribute to BP regulation on a beat-to-beat basis (i.e., sympathetic transduction). Previous work suggests that OF have attenuated resting sympathetic transduction but there is a need for additional work considering covariates that affect sympathetic transduction (e.g., body mass index (BMI) 18-35 years) participants matched for body composition and pre-trial sodium intake. METHODS: We studied seven post-menopausal OF (65±6 years) and nine YF (24±4 years; tested in early follicular phase) participants with seated brachial BP 0.06). The following data are presented as OF vs. YF with mean ± SD or medianIQR. Mean BP (9722 vs. 775 mmHg, p=0.008) and MSNA burst frequency (35±6 vs. 13±4 bursts/min, p<0.0001) were higher in OF. OF had lower mean BP changes following MSNA bursts (time: p<0.0001, group: p=0.013, interaction: p=0.026) with pairwise differences among cardiac cycles 4-10 (post hoc p-values: p≤0.012). Moreover, peak increases in mean BP following MSNA bursts were lower in OF (Δ1.9±0.4 vs. 4.9±2.2 mmHg, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: We found that OF have attenuated sympathetic transduction to BP when compared to YF matched for body composition and sodium intake. This extends past work suggesting that female aging is associated with attenuated sympathetic transduction to BP. National Institutes of Health K01HL160772 (JCW), American Heart Association 23CDA1037938 (JCW), & Florida State University Graduate School Legacy Fellowship, 2023 (CD). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Domeier et al. (Wed,) studied this question.