Background and Aims Tolvaptan is approved by NICE in the treatment of PKD afterrandomised controlled trials demonstrated a reduction in decline in eGFR. Aquaresis occurs as an effect, and this may limit tolerability as the second dose in a day causes nocturia and disturbed sleep. Thirty-three patients in our specialist PKD clinic were treated based on criteria of bipolar renal length >=15cm and decline in eGFR by > −5 ml/min/yr. We evaluated their real-life outcome regarding measures of adherence including an adapted Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale © (by permissions.nursing.unibas.ch/) originally validated for immunosuppression medications in transplant patients. A further 24 patients had finished treatment at our centre and were excluded as BAASIS could not be applied in hindsight. However, they illustrated a notably high level of intolerance leading to cessation in 16/24 (9 with nocturia, 4 transaminitis, 1 angioedema, 1 rash, 1 fatigue) emphasizing the importance of this work on adherence and response. Method BAASIS addresses recall of treatment adherence in the preceding 4 weeks, all 33 patients currently treated as of 16/1/24 were screened on telephone by two independent auditors with a standard non-judgemental introductory script designed to result in candid engagement. Investigators were blinded to renal outcomes. A decline in eGFR of less than 5 ml/min/yr was defined as treatment response. Results Of the 33 patients included, 14 males and 19 females, median age 49yrs (range 32-72), were on treatment for a mean of 2.7yr (SD 2.2, range 0.3-7.5). Mean eGFR (CKD-EPI) was 58 ml/min (SD 19, range 28-110) at start and 48 ml/mi (SD 23, range 17-102) at end of treatment. Median total daily dose was 120 mg/d (range 60-120). Attendance at clinic for monitoring was 100%. 18/33 patients had responded to treatment, with delta eGFR –0.1 ml/min/year (SD 3.4) versus non-responders’' delta eGFR –13 ml/min/year (SD 8.7) There was a total of 35 instances of non-implementation in 23/33 patients with missed (20 instances), delayed (13 instances) or self-alteration in doses (2 instances). Only 10/33 patient made no failure to implement Tolvaptan at any time. There were 9 patients with non-persistence of Tolvaptan treatment. Associative analysis of renal outcome with adherence was made for all 31 patients who had more than 6 months treatment, 2 patients being excluded because treatment had been too short-term. 25/31 had non-adherence defined by non-implementation or non-persistence or both, but this did not statistically associate with treatment failure ChiSq 1.951 p = 0.16. The element of non-implementation alone was however associated with treatment failure ChiSq 4.949 p = 0.03, this term includes patient behaviour of not taking and mistiming drug taking, and patient-initiated dose reduction and drug holidays. Conclusion Just over half (55%) of currently treated patients had made a clinical response to Tolvaptan. 23/33 patients had non-implementation within the 4 weeks preceding the validated adherence survey, and this was significantly associated with treatment failure. This study is limited to a small single-centre patient cohort but could easily be applied more widely. This study informs shared-decision making and we should encourage our patients to take this high-cost drug in the right amount and at the right times, and notably not to miss doses, thereby to achieve higher clinical response rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solanki et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: