All papers published in this volume have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews (2 required per paper) were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single anonymous • Conference submission management system: Morressier • Number of submissions received: 174 • Number of submissions sent for review: 173 • Number of submissions accepted: 171 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 98% • Average number of technical reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of technical reviewers involved: 132 • Format quality control: In addition to the technical reviews, all papers went through an initial quality control review process handled via the peer review system. • Contact person for queries: Name: Annett Cady Affiliation: Centennial Conferences Email: cecicmc@centennialconferences.com
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2024 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: