This study aims to reveal the effectiveness of future society and early childhood education subjects using the team teaching method, focusing on creativity confluence competency, problem-solving capacities, and information literacy. The targeted subjects of the study were 12 students who took the future society and early childhood education class in the Early Childhood Education Department at K University. The collected data has confirmed the tendency of research variables through basic statistical analysis (M, SD) using SPSS 23.0. We have chosen non-parametric statistical methods through the Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Shapiro-Wilk normality test. For this study, the difference in distribution between paired samples can be identified, so the Wilcoxon test has been performed. The main results are as follows. Firstly, because of normality test, the significance levels of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests were p<.05 in some cases. It turned out to be dissatisfied with the normality. Secondly, significant differences in research variables have been observed in the overall and sub-domains of creativity and convergence competency (i.e. creative ability, personality & leadership, and convergent thinking & value creation), overall problem-solving ability and sub-domains excluding problem solution implementation (i.e. problem discovery, definition, solution design & problem solution examination), and overall information utilization ability and sub-domains (i.e. information demand, retrieval, evaluation, integration, representation & ethics). The results of this study are meaningful in that they provide basic data for operating the team teaching method efficiently. In addition, based on the research results, we plan to advance the subject and foster the right future talent by enhancing the abilities necessary with the advent of the 4th Industrial Revolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyeyoung Jo (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: