The impact of occupational exposure on bacterial community dynamics in selected ecologicalniches of the human dermal ecosystem was examined. Samples were collected from threeskin niches (palms, forearms and feet) of volunteers for different occupations (automobilemechanics, civil servants, food vendors, traffic officers, masons and welders) to make acomposite and examined using standard microbiological methods. Results showed that 46.7%of the bacteria abundance was from the palms, 28.7% from feet and 24.6% from forearms.Based on occupation type, the highest bacterial abundance was isolated from Mason (23.5%)while the lowest was recorded in Civil servants (11.4%). Based on occupational exposure byniches, palms have the highest bacterial abundance from Masons (26.8%) while the lowestwas from Auto-mechanics (9.4%). Forearms have the highest from Masons (20.9%) while thelowest was from civil servants (6.0%). Feet have the highest from Masons (20.5%) while thelowest was from Civil servants (10.3%). Eight (08) bacterial species (Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus viridans, Citrobacter spp., Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis) were isolated from the palms, Five (05) (Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) from the fore arms while Seven (07) species (Corynebacterium spp., Propiniobacterium granulosum, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) from the feet. B. subtilis, S. aureus, S. epidermidis were common to all niches. Occupational exposure can cause dermal bacterial community dynamics which could be of potential dermatological importance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: