Recognising the impact of medical errors on patients and the doctor-patient relationship has underscored the need for better communication.1,2 For the most part, these efforts are informed by Chafe et al.’s 6 steps that entail: (1) the identification of the error in a timely fashion; (2) determination of the extent of the error; (3) constitution of a workgroup to establish the scope of the review; (4) identification of affected patients; (5) scrutiny of clinical records; and (6) the act of informing patients and other stakeholders.3-6 The apology and open disclosure are then said to be built upon this platform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: