It is well-known that within Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF), the Axiom of Choice (AC) implies the Maximal Ideal Theorem (MIT), namely that every commutative ring has a maximal ideal. The converse implication MIT ⇒ AC was first proved by Hodges, with subsequent proofs given by Banaschewski and Ern\'e. Here we give another derivation of MIT ⇒ AC, aiming to make the exposition self-contained and accessible to non-experts with only introductory familiarity with commutative ring theory and naive set theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexei Entin (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: